Friday, January 31, 2025

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024)

 


Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024)

Director: Tim Burton

Stars: Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder, Catherine O’Hara

Short Review, no spoilers

The exhumation of a beloved film is a tough task – especially when more than three decades have passed - but mostly Beetlejuice Beetlejuice is very successful and very funny. Surprisingly grislier than the first, it’s pleasingly true to the characters and dark wit of the original and overall a joy, if slightly overloaded at times.

Full Review (spoilers)

Frighteningly, this sequel arrives 36 years after the first and wonderfully original Beetlejuice, so the fact that it is so loyal in tone and the performances so rewarding is impressive. Ironically it means that the film is quite fresh, adopting as it does its characteristic flippancy towards the theme of death and general embrace of things ‘strange and unusual.’ Micheal Keaton gamely dons the black and white suit again and musters the mania to bring the grottily loveable Beetlejuice back in to our sanitised world, and he’s even more disgusting than before. Touchingly though, he still holds a candle for Lydia and, like it or not, she and stepmother Delia are unable to prevent his resurrection back in to their lives. In fact, for all their grimacing complaints, it always seems to be this grubby king of chaos that is needed when all else is lost.

Women are enjoyably pushed forward in to the action but without contrivance. Catherine O’Hara embraces the wonderfully awful Delia again like an old glove, and there is a nice chemistry between her and Winona Ryder’s Lydia, like a resigned acceptance between chalk and cheese relations. Ironically Lydia is having motherly struggles of her own with daughter Astrid – Jenny Ortega who, like Ryder before her, manages to play the grumpy teenager in sympathetic fashion. And there is a very clever twist in terms of Astrid’s love interest, a charming young lad with old-fashioned interests.

Another twist in meta terms is the representation of original character Charles Deetz – in a reversal of the recent AI controversy of conjuring up actors who are deceased, the character is made dead to cover for the living actor, Jeffrey Jones. Rather than recast, eliminate a well-loved character or, as above, design an AI doppelganger, the filmmakers honour the character’s memory in true Beetlejuice style by wittily including him as a blood-spurting, headless ghost.

Minor complaints are that some parts were a tad underwritten and thrown in, such as Monica Bellucci as Beetlejuice’s ex, who is excellent in terms of spectacle but ultimately not a great deal more than a prop. A bit more Beetlejuice would have been nice, while Willem Defoe is disappointing and Justin Theroux doesn’t fully hit the mark. Overall though, a very enjoyable ride and respectful sequel.

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

The Wedding Singer (1998)

 


The Wedding Singer (1998)

Director: Frank Coraci

Stars: Adam Sandler, Drew Barrymore

Short Review

The Wedding Singer was ahead of its time as possibly the first film to look back at the horror of the 80s, but does so in such a sweet and funny way as to bring a happy closure to those haunted by the big hair and tacky clothes of that era. All round it’s a perfect romantic comedy with universal appeal, and also the first pairing of Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore in what would continue to be a winning combination.

Full Review

Although it followed Happy Gilmore and Billy Madison, The Wedding Singer was less an Adam Sandler vehicle and more a product of a very successful collaboration. With a script in place by old buddy Tim Herlihy, apparently Drew Barrymore pursued Sandler and the role vociferously and once secured, recommended Carrie Fisher as script doctor, something which clearly aided the authentic balancing of male/female characterisations. Moreover, it would be the first instance of what would prove to be a consistently well-played chemistry between Sandler and Barrymore, with both on the cusp of a new era of super stardom.

Essentially, it’s a sweet story and although loaded with 80s signifiers, this is arguably the icing on a [wedding…] cake that reflects as much about 1998 as anything. For one, it critiques greed and yuppiedom, with flashy materialism out and a grungier, more down to earth ethos in. Judging by online comments today, it is actually now seen as odd that one era should be so different to one only 13 years previously, however this sadly just confirms the stalling and stagnation of cultural activity and production that we have fallen in to in recent times. The fact is, post-war 20th century decades were all very different from each other in a constant wave of change. Perhaps 1998 is even a sea change year itself, a peak of daft romance and care-free optimism before the darkness set in - The Wedding Singer, Furbys, the year Google was invented, Brad and Jennifer before Brad and Angelina …

As for the film itself though, it wears its kitsch trappings with ironic obviousness, with characters who dress like Madonna and Michael Jackson, but it is also a heartfelt romcom and a rare one with appeal for men and women. There are supporting oddities in Sandler-esque fashion, including cameos from Steve Buscemi, Alexis Arquette and Jon Lovitz that add to its idiosyncratic charm, and an excellently emotionally damaged Cure-inspired song performed by Sandler himself. Even Billy Idol shows up at the end looking virtually like he did in the 80s so saving money on prosthetics.

Perfect for Valentine’s, The Wedding Singer has wide ranging appeal and happily looks to be standing the test of time.



Wednesday, December 18, 2024

Anora (2024)

 


Anora (2024)

Director: Sean Baker

Stars: Mikey Madison, Mark Eydelshteyn, Karren Karagulian, Yura Borisov

Short Review, no spoilers

A modern romance Sean Baker style, meaning that Anora is funny, edgy and features compelling characters from the margins of society. Mikey Madison is excellent as the titular heroine, balancing the coquettishness of a successful sex worker with the toughness of a feisty lady up against it in a similar vein to the remarkable Bria Vinaite in Baker’s The Florida Project. A particularly well-rounded film from this exciting director, there’s a maturing of style without losing any of his signature wit and playfulness.

Full Review (spoilers)

Unusually for a director whose vision is so strikingly original, Baker essentially takes the premise of Pretty Woman for the setup of Anora – hooker meets super rich dude, rich dude is so impressed with her talents he hires her for a week, hooker and rich dude fall in love. Cinder-fuckin-rella is even referenced, however, this is no derivative tedious remake, but an arch update that takes the story and moves it away from the fantastically sentimental ending of the Julia Roberts blockbuster.

Irony is introduced from the start, with Gary Barlow anthemically vocalising the prospect of ‘the greatest day of our lives’ to the visuals of lap dancers writhing and pounding away slow motion on punter’s groins in a night club. We go on to see Anora at work, deftly attracting and satisfying customers, glamorously attired and hair shimmering in stark contrast to her more vulnerable-looking body wrapped up against the cold after her shift. Small touches like this are what make a Sean Baker film, showing bold characters in all their guises, including in their bleaker states without ever being condescending.

The turning point is when Anora’s Russian heritage comes in handy for a rich, young client, the daft and delighted Ivan who seems unable to believe his luck. After a coy request for a date outside of the club, Anora arrives at his pad and the combination of an easy attitude to casual sex and his boyish exuberance makes the whole thing seem perfectly innocent, endearing almost. Anora takes it in her stride but cheerily takes him up on his offer of a week of being his girlfriend, and so the love affair begins. Like the frequent fornication and raunchy performative grinding, drugs and partying are just a part of the carefree lifestyle that Anora joins Ivan and his friends in, although these are the kind of kids who can also take a private plane to Las Vegas on a whim. Very cleverly however, Ivan is depicted as a wide-eyed innocent in opposition to the stereotype of a sneering elitist, indulging himself in the sweet shop his pals work in and video games like a typical youth, so when streetwise Anora falls for him, it seems like an understandable possibility. She giggles at his rabbit humping style of love-making and rapid completion, and is even kindly superior when she tries to tutor him. Why not leave a tough life behind and accept the proposal of an immature but seemingly sweet natured son of an oligarch?

Apart from one jealous bitch, Anora’s colleagues are happy for her and it really does seem like a Cinderella story as she takes off for her new life. Here however, is where Pretty Woman ends and Baker world takes over. Just as the newly weds are settling in to married life, Ivan’s outraged mother and the panic-stricken guardians that were supposed to be supervising Ivan in his parents’ absence come crashing in to the fairy tale. A turning point again, this one unexpected, as Prince Charming scampers away at the prospect of his parents coming home, abandoning a bewildered Anora to deal with 3 bodyguard oafs on her own. Baker isn’t afraid of a bit of slapstick and indulges in it wholeheartedly here, as Anora brings out her broad Brooklyn mouth big time, flings out wild accusations of rape and violence, and hilariously beats the shit out of her apparent kidnappers. One frantic, one sheepish, Toros – played by Karren Karagulian, a familiar face from Baker’s debut Tangerine - is called in from a baptism to deal with this unholy mess.

In the midst of all the madness is a hooded, vaguely brutish looking guy named Igor. Entering the fray of the second act, he’s seemingly a bystander in what becomes a chaotic mission to locate Ivan and get the marriage ‘annulled’, dragging poor Anora along to participate in the dissolution of the fairy tale she’s experienced for 5 minutes. However, Igor very slowly begins to grow in to the film and in to Anora’s eyeline – whether she likes it or not – repeatedly and consistently finding small ways to defend her and offer support. Played with sensitivity by Yura Borisov, Igor’s emergence in to a character of significance, an unexpected hero, occurs in such a slow, organic way as to be almost imperceptible. He even acts as emotional punch bag for the beleaguered Anora, withstanding her relentless hostility as she throws slings and arrows at him in her otherwise powerless state.

For a director so engaged in slices of raw real life, Baker is no slouch when it comes to aesthetics and symbolism. In terms of costume, Anora’s blue dress when she embarks on her journey with Ivan is a combination of the same shade of pure blue as the Disney Cinderella gown and the tight, half-blue number worn by Julia Roberts at the same moment of meeting Prince Charming in Pretty Woman. A red scarf is emblematic of Anora’s journey with Igor – it is first used to gag her in the ‘kidnapping’ scene, then offered by Igor as warmth when they are out searching for Ivan, and then as a symbol of defiance when Anora throws it back at its owner, the cruel stepmother type that is Ivan’s mother.

As in his previous films, America is a pointed backdrop to the failure and suffering of Baker’s heroes. A US flag figures prominently in the background as Toros rants at Armenian-American youths for being disrespectful and caring about nothing other than their new sneakers. The irony and hypocrisy of fairy tales gone astray in a country that has capitalised on them looms large in The Florida Project as well as in Anora. Baker’s target is clearly his own back-yard, however his criticisms with regards to unfairness and complacency could easily apply to other nations of the western world.

And it is clearly a system that Baker criticises rather than people. In a noticeable refusal to tar all Russians with Putin influenced characteristics of arch villainy, even the henchmen are just doing their job in bumbling fashion rather than with cruel brutality. And Anora’s ultimate saviour is a humble Russian who speaks broken English but understands what it means to care.

By the final scene, the film literally flips the Pretty Woman scenario on its head. In both, the set-up is a car is parked outside the building where the princess/hooker lives. However, in Pretty Woman it’s a bright, spring-like day whereas in Anora its cold and snowing. In Pretty Woman, Richard Gere is rescuing Julia Roberts, whereas Igor is taking Anora back to her slum. Edward (Gere) climbs up to Vivien (Roberts) but Anora waits for Igor to come down to her. Igor would seem to have far less to offer the princess – merely a place to stay at his grandma’s – but his care is genuine, something Anora still struggles to comprehend. She tries to give him what she thinks he wants in return when she straddles him right there in the car, but as the quietly erotic scene plays out, a makeshift effort at controlling a situation after so much of being tossed around gives way to vulnerability – Anora finally crumbles in to a safe place to cry, Igor’s arms.

Edward and Anora are comparable in that the happy ending can only be achieved by both overcoming their repression and denial, and in both cases, it is arguably a problem that arises out of their opposing social situations. Edward is a frosty cutthroat administrator from a stuffy, upper-class background, whereas Anora’s armour is the result of being a street tough escort who then has to deal with something even worse when she is degraded by the family of her apparent saviour. Pretty Woman features a degree of happily levelling up – Edward’s apparent superiority ends up looking superficial next to Vivien’s emotional experience and courage to take risks, and so they couple in relatively easy fashion at the end. No such lessons are learned by the spoiled rich kid that was to be Anora’s prince, but perhaps in a more modern and gratifying fairy tale ending, Anora loses the superficial prince and gains a true one through good fortune and fate – that doesn’t rely on filthy lucre - rather than from just being a charming and spunky date. As such, Anora finds a safe place to fall rather than a triumphant place to gloat.

Monday, September 23, 2024

An Albert Lewin Tribute – on the anniversary of his birth – 23rd September 1894

 






A Hollywood man with unusual dedication to intellectualism and the arts, Albert Lewin wrote more than directed, but his 6 completed films as director betray a pleasingly antagonistic thorn that pushed through philosophical, painterly, literary, spiritual and archaeological themes right under the noses of strict studio types to achieve some highly original and fascinating work.

The Moon and Sixpence (1942)

An astounding debut and as perfect a piece of filmmaking as Lewin achieved alongside The Private Affairs of Bel Ami, both of which star silky voiced George Sanders, although his performance here is particularly brilliant. In both he is cast as ‘the unmitigated cad’, a character type that he would become indelibly linked with throughout his career and life and, as Strickland the stockbroker who leaves his wife and child to become a painter (based on Somerset Maugham’s loose depiction of Paul Gaugin), he certainly earns the reputation with his utterly callous disregard for all humanity – especially women. The film is bookended by text that tentatively defends the unleashing of such an unabashedly amoral character as a hero but, as would continue to be the case with Lewin protagonists, there is far more complexity at hand than the controversial behaviours and statements would simplistically bind them to. Sanders performs this complexity beautifully, with the depths of his talent revealed in the moments when Strickland finds his very Lewin form of redemption – true love is his unexpected salvation and is seen in his expression, a softening, along with regret and fear at the prospect of losing something that finally means something to him.

The Picture of Dorian Gray (1945)

A wonderful adaptation and Lewin’s darkest film, the director continued to push through scandalous events and characters in to mainstream cinema in a manner that may well have delighted Oscar Wilde. Hurd Hatfield is chilling as the icily beautiful Dorian and George Sanders appears again as the cad (Lord Wotton), but this time as one whose self-satisfaction is tolerated in a high society populated by other individuals who are not much better. Regrettably for Dorian and his victims, the young man adopts Wotton’s philosophy of pursuing self pleasure at all costs and obsession with the armour of youth against consequences for one’s actions, to the point that a painting absorbs his corruption while he engages in wicked deeds and remains visibly youthful – and therefore superficially innocent to those around him. The titular painting is revealed in all its horror in colour, and an excellent representation of Wilde’s dastardly vision of human corruption it is. This would be one of many recurring motifs, seen before in The Moon and Sixpence and after in The Private Affairs of Bel Ami. Significant also is the destruction of painted artworks, linking indelibly the power of art with life and death.

The Private Affairs of Bel Ami (1947)

Perhaps Lewin’s most flawless filmic construction, The Private Affairs of Bel Ami is a delight, even as it once again features a ‘hero’ whose actions are relentlessly condemnable. Sanders is our dreadful man again, but continues to be compelling enough to capture our attention and even dare us to pity him in the end. This is owed as much however, to the clever and captivating women around him as anything, who fall in love with him, tolerate him and hate him in his journey to assert himself with power, influence and wealth in late 19th century Paris. Angela Lansbury reappears from The Picture of Dorian Gray and is phenomenal as Clodette, a witty, beautiful and whole-hearted woman who would be Bel Ami’s salvation if he wasn’t so greedy and ambitious as to not allow himself to accept it – before it’s too late.


Pandora and the Flying Dutchman (1951)

Beautiful, mystical, sensuous madness sumptuously photographed by Jack Cardiff, Pandora and the Flying Dutchman is a beguiling artefact of movie history and what could be done with a 1950s screen goddess and a darkly romantic surreal fantasy. Although seemingly a leap from the elaborate parlour games, wicked male objects of desire, and black and white photography of Lewin’s first three films, the lavish Technicolor and mystical women that would mark the difference between them and his latter three are minor diversions from what would still clearly be an autueristic continuance. Entering 1950s Hollywood with a colourful and passionate bang there are nevertheless recognisable themes of love, fate and death uniting to guide our flawed characters to their inevitable destiny. Again a painted portrait and it’s ‘destruction’ features, and although Lewin was accused of overly wordy dialogue, his love of silent film is in effect. This we understand better when we consider his use of voiceover narration, an element employed to allow visuals to play out uninterrupted and to provide significant depth to the actors’ performances.

Saadia (1953)

Superficially, Saadia could be mistaken for standard Hollywood fare, revolving as it does around a love triangle and episodes of adventure in an exotic land, but this is perhaps more to do with the foregrounding of certain elements against the original wishes of Lewin. More interesting are the finer details, recurring themes from Lewin’s previous films, and the regrettably diminished part of a sorceress who has a disturbing obsession with the lead character. This part was cut down by the studio to foreground the love triangle, leaving the film unbalanced in terms of plot and character. As a result, the views of the two male characters hold sway when they otherwise would have provided an interestingly repressed counterpoint to the feverish and startling performance by Wanda Rotha as Fatima the sorceress, and also Rita Gam’s charismatic turn as Saadia, whose bravery and skill that is directly related to her Berber heritage is as crucial to events as the French doctor’s medicine and the Caid’s power as a respected local authority. Patience is required for some of the stilted performances and dialogue, but it is well worth seeing for another spirited and inspiring female performance, some beguilingly beautiful cinematography, and authentic celebration of traditional Moroccan culture. It also features a resolution to romantic complications that, without compromising Lewin’s sensitivity to complex human relations, is more happily worked through.

The Living Idol (1957)

Lewin’s latter films have been regrettably dismissed, even by his fans and the man himself. However, Saadia and The Living Idol are not nearly so bad – at the least, they continue to be intriguingly unusual diversions from the norm, and they are in fact quite entertaining and feature Lewin’s characteristic attention to female characters that are vulnerable to outside forces but that demonstrate great fortitude and resilience in the face of it. As in his previous films, there are two characters that debate and tussle over one realm that would appear to deal solely with the emotional and fantastical, the selfish and the willful, against the pragmatic, the scientific and the political, while meanwhile in their midst is one who brings it all together through their very being, unintentionally or deliberately. All are pawns (chess and marionettes are other consistent recurring motifs), but Juanita shares with Strickland, Dorian, Bel Ami, Pandora and Saadia the proof of natural – or supernatural? – beings that are propelled upon a journey of destiny, linked to art, symbolism and culture that is universal, if realised in seemingly unique ways. Juanita is guided to repeat the rituals of her ancestors in order to face her demons, much as she and others repeat the actions of former Lewin characters, uniting a fascinating little group of films that deserve more attention than they have been assigned.


Conclusion - Lewin’s sometimes seemingly flippant address to what is deemed most serious in life – predominantly death – was occasionally dismissed as an irony that let down the profound points he was trying to integrate in to his Hollywood films. I would argue that in misunderstanding the style, the point is inevitably misunderstood. Lewin addressed the inevitability of death, as well as the complacent value placed in life, and linked it to the power of the visual and to objects loaded with symbolism. He also depicted some of the most passionate tributes to love ever seen on screen, which in itself would appear to counter any argument that he was only dispassionately ironic. Instead, one of the many things that Lewin seemed to understand, was that appreciation of love and life in its deepest sense could perhaps only be truly understood by its momentous place next to the triviality of death.

Tuesday, August 6, 2024

The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (2004)

 


The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou (2004)

Director: Wes Anderson

Stars: Bill Murray, Owen Wilson, Anjelica Huston, Cate Blanchett, Willem Dafoe

Short Review, no spoilers

Wry postmodern kitsch is the dressing over a fond and nostalgic tribute to awe-inspired TV childhood memory, as Wes Anderson presents a flawed American version of oceanographer Jacques Cousteau in the character of Steve Zissou. Zissou also has fans and a legacy but one that is as rusty and in danger of sinking for good as the Belafonte research vessel he and his crew use to career from one rickety adventure to another. 20 years old now and worthy of an anniversary celebration.

Full Review (spoilers)

Diversity of public opinion is an important thing however, sometimes the way in which it is divided is like a space oddity. For one who has never been a member of the Wes Anderson fan club, this critic is nevertheless a long-time lover of his 2004 film The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou starring Bill Murray. This apparently flies in the faces of those normally more dedicated to Anderson output, with The Life Aquatic tending to be the least favoured and ugly duckling of his oeuvre. Stranger still though, what alienates this critic from appreciating Anderson’s style generally appears to correspond exactly with what Anderson fans don’t like about The Life Aquatic, namely that the film is burdened with arch, mannered acting and a style of whimsical idiosyncrasy that is at best, hard to get, and at worst, annoying. Aquatic has been accused of having no heart (?!), and yet this is precisely what I think sets it apart.

Even Anderson regular Owen Wilson is gently likeable in a performance that works well with Murray’s - as Ned, the potentially long-lost son of Zissou, and half of a relationship that is strangely affecting and ultimately even heartbreaking. Likewise is Ned’s romance with Cate Blanchett’s Jane - another actor I have admittedly struggled to warm to until her turn in Todd Haynes’ beautiful film, Carol - and there are yet more deftly performed layers brought to bear by Anjelica Huston, her usual dignified and subtly complex self in a role that hovers over all of the above and guides what goes on between them. Here we can see the point of large, all-star casts performing an intricate family set-up – actors successfully playing their parts in a complex menagerie of related people – and less so a predictable roll call that looks impressive on a movie poster.

The ever-versatile Willem Dafoe is hilarious in a rare comedy role, and Bill Murray’s performance is a key one in his renaissance of the late 20th century and in to the early 2000s. This era saw Murray as more nuanced and less obvious; here he is the fool but one situated as a post hippy Reaganite, a human hangover of a crossover period and now left for dust. But for all his outdated flaws, Zissou is himself – maybe a pot-smoking relic who can’t understand why journalist Jane won’t go to bed with him, but nevertheless endearing, even inspirational, in his fallibility.

Overall, The Life Aquatic is a comedy with touches of dry wit balanced with colours of retro and genuine sentiment, set design of creative and loving detail, and action that features some surprising adventures. Oh and a sublime soundtrack of David Bowie sung in Portuguese.

Monday, July 1, 2024

Sometimes I Think About Dying (2023)

 

Sometimes I Think About Dying (2023)

Director: Rachel Lambert

Stars: Daisy Ridley, Dave Merheje, Parvesh Cheena, Marcia DeBonis

Short Review, no spoilers

Delightfully offbeat piece with some of the perceptive irony of Todd Solondz minus his searing cynicism. Quietly powerful, inspiring and cathartic, the performances are understated and well-drawn including an excellent demonstration of versatility from Daisy Ridley. Beautifully shot and scored, it’s a bleakly heart-wrenching but also very funny portrait of average desperation and loneliness.

Full Review (spoilers)

Mediocrity never goes away – but neither, I hope, do those who are willing
to challenge it.” – Miloš Forman*

The 1975 classic One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, directed by Milos Forman, opens with a dreamy view of the mountains followed by shots of psychiatric inpatients emerging slowly in to their average day. In one shot we see a US flag, situating it in America but could it be anywhere? Czech New Wave directors like Forman understood the potential to make statements about oppression in society with stories about ordinary people filmed in melancholically humorous ways. Fellow New Waver Ivan Passer describes making a list with Milos Forman of ways to make films that could be released under Communist party rule, one of which was to make comedies.** Sometimes I Think About Dying similarly opens with delicate images of an early morning on sleepy streets as a deer tentatively emerges from a garden and apples are seen rotting in a road drain. There’s something about the wistful imagery here and throughout, along with an ironically playful, haunting music score, that resonates with One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. The latter was also made in Oregon with some scenes filmed in a similarly coastal region of Depoe Bay less than a 3-hour drive from Astoria. Differently however, Sometimes I Think About Dying is shot in a coolly muted light with the sense of off-peak seaside towns in England, while the coastal scenes in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest are grainy but more sunnily presented. Whereas in one film the environment and climate reflect our hero’s bleak state of mind, in the other it is one of many stages for optimistic rebellion led by the iconic character of R.P. McMurphy, played with furiously infectious energy by Jack Nicholson in one of his most outstanding performances.

In both films a European sensibility trickles through a distinctly American setting – in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, it is via the direction of Czech pioneer Forman. But in Sometimes I Think About Dying, the humorous banality resonates with a traditionally wry English dreariness. Monotony and petty grievances characterise the ‘events’ that take place in both institutions: a psychiatric hospital and office workplace respectively. And in both films, it takes the arrival of a newcomer to shake things up, although it’s the receptivity of the currently institutionalised residents/workers that also create actual change.

In Sometimes I Think About Dying, jolly retiree Carol – known mostly from heroine Fran’s point of view by the back of her head – is replaced by Robert, a sociable and easy-going guy who secretly confides to Fran that he’s never really had a job before. Via email (naturally, even though they are about a metre or so away from each other), Fran warns him to keep that to himself, one of several hints at office politics that lurk behind the apparently friendly unity of a workplace. Another is the phony camaraderie during Robert’s introduction to the team when we realise that the manager is young, doughnut loving Isobel in subtler but nevertheless classic David Brent character mode with probably deluded visions of themselves as a ‘chilled-out’ boss. There are two funny moments in this scene that signal how little any of them actually know each other despite Isobel’s presentation of familiarity. The team are momentarily embarrassed when colleague Garrett has to remind them that he’s a vegetarian (a ‘fact’ that he later reveals was ironically faked for his own amusement), and even more so when oddball Rich contradicts assumptions that he loves fishing based on a photograph seen of him holding a big fish. The awkwardness of these moments lay bare what it is to know people beyond basic signifiers, the status quo being disturbed by unexpected ‘honesty’. Funnily enough, there is a comparable moment in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest - the same kind of fish catching photo is noticed by McMurphy in the head psychiatrist’s office however, McMurphy provocatively questions the validity of this photo from the get-go.

Indeed, McMurphy questions everything in front of him, even as he is questionable himself. His being in the hospital in the first place is up for scrutiny throughout, however, after seeing Nurse Ratched in action for a while, he tells the evaluating shrinks in a review that Ratched ‘ain’t honest.’ They defend the long-standing, well respected matron of the ward but McMurphy sees the passive aggression behind her apparent care and professionalism. There’s no Nurse Ratched in Sometimes I Think About Dying but a less fascistic dishonesty is shared by all, preventing people knowing each other better and thus truly unifying as a result. The office workers are patronised as much as the psychiatric patients are infantilised. And the benign mask of Isobel isn’t a front for such devastating power as that held by Nurse Ratched however, the false familiarity does obscure Fran’s utter alienation in a team that she has apparently been a part of for some time.

Completely opposite to McMurphy - a rebel who immediately explodes in to the story as a charismatically disruptive outsider - Fran clearly engages in a well-established role by which she goes out of her way to sustain the most limited presence possible. Similarly to McMurphy however, people around our central character respond accordingly, with the patients in the asylum stirred by this electric new presence while Fran’s co-workers can’t see to make any effort in including the quiet young lady already in their midst. Those with impatience for shyness may struggle to understand, but the conflicting agonies in yearning to be acknowledged one moment and wishing to fade away in another is made exquisitely visual with brilliant perception and empathy by Ridley. It is both painful and endearingly funny, particularly when Fran literally squirms away from Robert’s casual friendliness, made poignant by the fact that he’s unaware of her non-status in the office so tries to get to know her like everybody else – the pure non-judgementalism from a group newbie. This is also a significant aspect of McMurphy’s arrival – not knowing the system, he treats the patients like men and not just like a bunch of ‘nuts’. (In another way, Fran is like Chief in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, in that she is virtually silent and dismissively ignored until the gregarious newcomer arrives and affords her opportunity for recognition).

It might seem strange to compare a 1970s mental institution with a modern-day office workplace, but they are after all two such places where disparate people are put together and from which weird group dynamics evolve as a result. However, the soul-scraping of Nurse Ratched’s group therapy creates a situation whereby all of the men are overbearingly aware of each other’s various gripes, whereas the phoney façade of office camaraderie in Sometimes I Think About Dying oppresses expression of any meaningful internal issues at all. This is thrown in to a light outside of Fran’s experience when she bumps in to jolly Carol sometime after her leaving the office. Sat in a coffee shop, she confesses to Fran that her husband was taken ill before they could take their much-anticipated retirement cruise leaving her alone and sad. She speaks of ‘doing the right thing’, as in working hard her whole life and waiting for her opportunity to relax and leisure with her husband, only to get there and it be too late. Thus, even one who works hard and is socially engaged in an acceptable way can end up with suffering and isolation. There is empathetic comfort to be found in one who also knows pain and loneliness though, as Fran listens quietly to a woman who no longer exists to the group she recently left - in spite of the cake and good wishes.

Of the soundtrack to Sometimes I Think About Dying, creator Dabney Morris says this:

"Early in the pre-production stage of the film, [director] Rachel Lambert approached me with an idea that we treat Astoria, OR, as though it had the same escapist allure as a Hawaiian getaway. This ultimately took us down the seemingly endless rabbit hole of the often-eye-rolled-at genres of exotica and lounge. Pulling inspiration from Martin Denny, Les Baxter, Arthur Lyman, Henry Mancini, and the dreary, dull Pacific Northwest coast, we were able to imagine a score that was at once lush and enticing, yet dark with a sort of romantic macabre." ***

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest features an equally haunting music score that combines the easy listening mind fuzz from the asylum ward record player with the plaintive, wayward and sometimes heart-wrenching notes of a musical saw. There’s also irony in the track title ‘Bus to Paradise’ when McMurphy hijacks the patient outing bus to take the men fishing, and even Hawaiian influence in another track titled ‘Aloha Los Pescadores’ which I believe translates as ‘Hello Fishermen’. The recurring theme of fishing suggests the freedom of the sea contrasted with being caught and trapped – hook, line and sinker. Carol’s big holiday and well-earned freedom is also linked to the sea, only to be robbed of it and trapped when she thought she had earned her release. The main musical theme in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest bears close resemblance to easy listening classic ‘Please Release Me’, alluding to the thin line between escapism and desperation.

Fran’s escapism stops at the sea, instead manifesting itself in fantasies about dying either on a beach or in a forest. I was reminded of a controversial character’s similarly nihilistic visions in Todd Solondz’s Happiness. No one depicts irony – and of the darkest kind – much better than Solondz, who similarly played out images of human death in the normally soothing context of nature and relaxation in Happiness. The character involved is far more provocative to audience identification however, Fran’s inward-leaning preoccupation with death will still seem uncomfortably morbid to some. The irony at play though is that it is sometimes the embrace of death that can more profoundly bring a sense of life and living in to one’s existence. To Fran, death is a potentially liberating feeling of escaping her life. Not that she wants to die necessarily, as proven by the manner in which she seizes on her opportunity to make a relationship with Robert (whether she knows what to do with it once she has it or not). But, as Chief feels for McMurphy, to Fran, dying appeals more than living life lifelessly. Even the game that she finds herself engaging in at a party involves pretend murder, but again Fran finds it to be a successful way to be imaginative and part of a social gathering. Of course, when pretending to die is the challenge, no one is more spontaneously creative than Fran, showing that even being good at imagining death can be a positive. Her fellow partygoers are surprised and delighted and Fran feels the enjoyment of human interaction.

At the end, Fran finally breaks down her personal boundaries and also the modern societal rule of confessing face to face rather than through some sort of platform. When she tells Robert that sometimes she thinks about dying, he pauses and then, non-judgementally, without saying a word, hugs her, and then we see the forest floor from Fran’s death fantasy appear around them – now Fran is feeling through the understanding from another person rather than through the release of death.

The tragedy in Sometimes I Think About Dying trickles gently throughout but ultimately ends life-affirmingly, whereas One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest ends in tragedy after a spirited challenge to the misery of accepted routine and the endurance of societally ordained micro aggressions. Both explore the importance of taking risks - McMurphy’s actions are always inspiringly informed by throwing caution to the wind while Fran’s are by cautiously containing herself entirely - until that is, she seizes her opportunity to break down her own asylum walls. The arrival of Robert is that opportunity, but Fran has to make it happen before he maybe joins the rest of her colleagues in barely acknowledging her existence. In the world of One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, an inspirational leader is crucial to positive disruption, and that disruption has clearer, wider societal implications. In Sometimes I Think About Dying, there are no inspirational leaders and, in a world increasingly focused on the individual, Fran’s microcosmic problem is one she has to take on herself.

Through alternative voices, we see that oppression can be present in any society at any time, but also that there is hope where it can be broken down, even in the most subtle ways. McMurphy is appalled when he finds out that most of the inpatients are voluntary, that individuals may choose to escape in to a prison because they can’t cope with what an apparently free society demands. In Sometimes I Think About Dying, Fran retreats in to herself and in to fantasy, while others are only loosely connected by the convenience of working together. Seemingly forever alienated until Robert arrives, Fran exists on the fringes of society. It might not seem like a world-beater, but if resistance to an assigned role begins with the individual, then this is perhaps one place to start.

 

*https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/notable-deaths-in-2018/100/

** The filmmaker said, “I believe that the Party was worried when they saw ordinary people, with all their weaknesses and strengths, depicted on screen. I think they also preferred to be attacked directly rather than to be ignored completely.” https://www.filmcomment.com/blog/still-free-interview-ivan-passer/#:~:text=Before%20the%20clampdown%2C%20Milos%20and,were%20more%20tolerant%20with%20comedies.

***https://cinemacy.com/exclusive-dabney-morris-debuts-track-from-sometimes-i-think-about-dying/

Friday, May 17, 2024

Monkey Man (2024)

 


Monkey Man (2024)

Director: Dev Patel

Stars: Dev Patel, Pitobash, Vipin Sharma, Sikandar Kher

Short Review, no spoilers

Top marks for the style and spirit of Dev Patel’s action movie directorial debut. And for none-streamers, gratitude that Netflix apparently bottled the opportunity to buy up a movie with perhaps controversial themes, allowing Jordan Peele to scoop it up and send it to its rightful place at cinemas. Exhilarating, well shot, frenetic and well performed with a neat balance of violence and humour that is overlaid with a passionately colourful palate of cultural personality that dances with cheekily fighting spirit over the dried-up husk of the relentless John Wick franchise that inspires it.

Full Review (spoilers)

Until now, Dev Patel has floated wide-eyed around the arena of endearing, harmless dorkiness. With Monkey Man however, he arrives as a different kind of physical presence, not wholly alienated from his former image, but still demanding fresh attention to an approach that now utilises his facial innocence and gangliness to more aggressive effect. In applying what can be a wonderful source of inspiration – simply making what you want to see and isn’t there – Patel is fuelled by action movie fandom that takes in the influences of Bruce Lee, Jackie Chan and the aforementioned John Wick. The besuited revenge ultraviolence of the latter is clearly in effect, along with a sweet dog homage that seems to be going down exactly the same road before cleverly twisting in a way that supports this particular narrative. However, the political underdog spirit, cultural character and wit of both Bruce Lee and Jackie Chan is more entertainingly at play.

Kid – aka Monkey Man, his underground ring fighter persona – couldn’t be more underdog throughout the entire first half of the film. True to his alter ego, he is smart and cheeky in his infiltration of the genuinely intimidating realm of powerful wealth and politics that harbour the killers of his family, but he’s lacking in ultimate impact when his carefully laid plan drastically unravels. There is witty camerawork such as the subtle pan that takes in a bottle of bleach hinting at how Kid comes up with his alias, and the highlighting of everyday social injustices in the midst of a zany car chase when the mats of street sleepers are stirred by friend Alphonso’s tuk-tuk whizzing by, likewise the afterburners of the flashed-up vehicle fuelling a street food stove. And when the purse of Queenie – brutal madam of high-class prostitutes and potty-mouthed wife of the man who killed Kid’s beloved mother - is swiped by a rotund, phoney beggar before it is passed cannily through the hands of various ordinary street folk with swift, unassuming accuracy, there is a wry and admiring authenticity to Patel’s celebration of true slumdogs.

Unafraid to include moments of humour in the midst of serious action antics, Patel demonstrates Kid’s sub-superhero capabilities when he launches himself at a window during an escape but bounces off it in decent slapstick style. Impressively however, these moments are not out of place in what is predominantly a serious revenge thriller that takes in broad strokes of social injustice. Kid embodies the image of a young but haunted man and one obsessed by childhood trauma and a relentless drive to put right the suffering of him and his. After carefully inserting himself in to the world of his targets, things go well wrong however and he ends up most wanted by the police and lucky to be alive after a tumble underwater following numerous beatings. Waking up in a secret refuge of transgender outcasts however, Kid embarks on the next part of both his physical and spiritual rebirth.

Although perhaps sadly misidentified by some critics as another clumsy box ticker, the introduction of the transgender group (hijra) actually seems entirely in keeping with both the outsider element of the story and contemporary cultural injustices. Channelled through symbols that, although ancient, can be interpreted as diversity-embracing (perhaps to the surprise of some who believe that such ideas could only have occurred yesterday), and aligning Kid with a maligned community, Kid’s recovery and rebuilding sits alongside former warrior outcasts in a temple sanctuary that celebrates Ardhanarishvara, a deity that celebrates masculine and feminine energies working simultaneously in harmony. Alpha - the leader of the community as her name suggests, but without the traditional associations the word usually ascribes solely to masculinity – assists Kid to address the trauma of witnessing his mother’s murder, kickstarting real progress before opportunity for a playful break in proceedings. Legendary tabla drummer Zakir Hussain performs a male/female arrangement during a relaxed evening, but also goes on to form an integral part of Kid’s training when the young avenger embarks on the gradual destruction of a large sack of rice.

Things are kicked in to proper action again when a member of the community is beaten trying to take down a threatening notice from the door of the temple. Kid returns to the baying arena as Monkey Man, only this time he has confronted his demons and is ready to fight like Hanuman, the monkey deity that inspires his persona and the hero of the story his mother told him as a child. It’s an excellently wrought comeback with Monkey Man putting out his first rival instantaneously to the bewilderment of both audience and the sleazy organiser, Tiger, who all expect him to bomb as usual. Opponents then continue to roll out but we have a new unexpected hero. Further embodying the spirit of the simian, Monkey Man stalks loose-armed between bouts, his ape mask pointed unreadably at his opponent. This before he bursts in to the crouches and hops of a maddeningly agile animal, even banging his chest when victorious.

It might be considered unusual for action stars - especially one filming himself – that there should be as much humility as Patel demonstrates in Monkey Man. But by not allowing the novelty of himself overshadow the film as a whole there is no sense of showboating, and Patel shows us enough to entertain without descending in to any kind of ego trip. If anything, we are perhaps left wanting more but only in the best possible way. In combining the apparently opposite tendencies of intensity and looseness, Patel draws upon the taught physicality but flowing movements of Bruce Lee without attempting to reach that legend’s technical heights. This humility comes across cinematically also when a masked Kid merely glances over his shoulder at his stricken opponent and is filmed in murky blur - stoic ambivalence as opposed to macho fist-pumping.

As well as an emphatic dress rehearsal for Kid’s big-time revenge finale, his victories help finance both the beleaguered hijra and provide a valuable tip-off for old friend, Alphonso. On to the serious business now though and Kid isn’t messing around anymore. Fighting his way to the top of a building The Raid -style, the levels of gratuitous violence increase with each floor. There are some elegant fighting skills on display – at one point atop a bar and back-lit by the warm glow of alcohol display aesthetics – but gratefully nothing flashily phony. Patel doesn’t try to super-hero himself or irritate too much with wild camera/editing antics and adds more wry references (with a twist), such as when Kid is confronted by hordes of enemies from every doorway like Uma Thurman in Kill Bill. However, here the cartoon aspect is lessened when the resolution to this dilemma appears in the form of his old hijra pals turning up armed and ready to assist rather than Kid having to take them all on himself.

Moving further up the echelons of classic combat homages as he continues upstairs, we see Kid initially distracted by disorientating reflections from dangling decorations in a reference to Bruce Lee in Enter the Dragon. And again in classic fashion, after the dispatching of many minions and an intimidating top henchman, it’s time to take on the corrupt bastard that has been dwelling hidden at the top all along, in this case an apparent guru and modern saviour who is actually behind all the corruption and murder that has ruined the city in question as well as the lives of forest dwellers like Kid’s family. Interestingly in this case, Kid appears to die with his adversary …? Like Bruce Lee’s hero characters, they don’t always survive the end of the movie. Sure if there is anything decent for Patel et al to add from here on in then fine, but there would be something quite fresh if Patel left it here.

Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024)

  Beetlejuice Beetlejuice (2024) Director: Tim Burton Stars: Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder, Catherine O’Hara Short Review, no spoilers ...